Minimally invasive esophagectomy for a large malignant schwannoma of the esophagus: a case report and review of the literature
Case Report

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for a large malignant schwannoma of the esophagus: a case report and review of the literature

Chigozirim N. Ekeke, Nicholas Baker, James Luketich, Ryan M. Levy

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Correspondence to: Ryan Levy, MD. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 9100 Babcock Blvd, Pittsburgh, PA 15237, USA. Email: levyrm@upmc.edu.

Abstract: Esophageal schwannomas are extremely rare submucosal tumors that pose a diagnostic challenge to surgeons. Of the reported 348 cases of esophageal schwannomas in the literature, only 9 demonstrated evidence of malignant degeneration. The reported surgical treatments of this rare tumor include endoscopic resection, enucleation, primary resection with repair of esophageal wall, and esophagectomy. A few case studies describe esophagectomy for esophageal schwannomas. Nine case reports reported malignant esophageal schwannomas, two of them were performed with an open esophagectomy. Malignant transformation is uncommon and diagnosis prior to esophagectomy can be challenging, despite advances in immunohistochemical staining. Imaging may be helpful for determining whether the tumor is malignant or benign. Size over 8 cm, 3–8 cm with a wide broad base or extensive mucosal defect are indications for esophageal resection. Esophageal schwannomas remain diagnostically challenging and evidence of malignant transformation is rarely evident on pre-operative biopsy. An esophagectomy approach should be considered in patients presenting with an enlarged malignant esophageal schwannoma. We report a case of a 33-year-old woman with a large malignant schwannoma of the esophagus which was completely resected by a minimally invasive esophagectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of surgically treated malignant esophageal schwannoma with a minimally invasive esophagectomy approach.

Keywords: Minimally invasive esophagectomy; malignant esophageal schwannoma; chest wall metastasis


Received: 02 March 2020; Accepted: 12 August 2020; Published: 25 December 2020.

doi: 10.21037/aoe-20-14


Introduction

Approximately 2% of esophageal tumors are benign: leiomyomas are the most common (80%), while gastrointestinal schwannomas are rare but can occur in the stomach (most commonly), colon and esophagus (1,2). Esophageal schwannomas are identified predominantly in middle-aged women and predominantly located in the proximal esophagus (3). These lesions are challenging to diagnose in the pre-operative setting, given limited pathological markers, non-specific findings on imaging studies (CT/PET scans), resulting in elevated false negative rate. Herein we report a patient with malignant esophageal schwannoma who underwent a minimally invasive esophagectomy. Her follow up oncologic course was notable for development of a chest wall metastasis 2 years of her index surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an initial minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignant esophageal schwannoma. We present the following article in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-14).


Case presentation

A 33-year-old woman presented to our clinic, following months of progressive dysphagia of several months and 75 pound weight loss during this period. Her past medical history was significant for morbid obesity, asthma and a notable smoking history (12 pack-year). Her family history was notable for hypertension and coronary artery disease, but there was no previous history of malignancy. A CT scan of the chest revealed an 8 cm in maximal diameter, large posterior mediastinal mass that was indistinguishable from the esophagus (Figure 1A). Subsequently, she underwent endoscopy, which showed a large, fungating esophageal mass extending from 30 to 38 cm from the incisors. The lesion was partially obstructing and encompassed half the luminal circumference (Figure 1B). Endoscopic biopsies suggested a spindle cell neoplasm. To better characterize the mass, an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was obtained, which showed a hypoechoic mass with a thickness greater than 60 mm invading the mediastinal fat (Figure 1C). Two malignant-appearing celiac axis lymph nodes were also visualized.

Figure 1 Radiographic and gross images of malignant schwannoma following esophagectomy. (A) Large homogenous mass in the posterior mediastinum, unable to distinguish esophageal lumen. (B) Endoscopic view of a large fungating mass in the mid-esophagus. (C) Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) showing the large mass (>60 mm thickness) with extension into mediastinal fat. (D) Resected esophagogastrectomy specimen with 8 cm long fungating mass.

One month following her initial clinic visit, the patient underwent an on-table endoscopy, staging laparoscopy, followed by minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Due to lesion size, morphological appearance on endoscopy, and concern for malignant nodal spread, tumor enucleation was not contemplated. Endoscopy was notable for a large amount of fetid, necrotic tumor debris in the mid to distal esophagus. There was no evidence of metastatic disease within the abdomen or chest upon laparoscopic and thoracoscopic evaluation. The suspicious celiac lymph nodes on CT scan were biopsied at the time of laparoscopy and found to be benign. Resection was accomplished using a minimally invasive (laparoscopic-thoracoscopic) Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis. The lesion was resected completely with negative proximal, distal and radial margins (Figure 1D). The patient’s postoperative course was complicated by aspiration pneumonia likely related to the necrotic tumor debris in the esophagus. She was discharged to home on post-operative day 10.

Final pathology demonstrated an 8 cm malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (schwannoma) arising from the muscularis propria with neoplastic spindle cells. Lymphadenectomy yielded 33 lymph nodes, all of which were negative for malignancy. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for Vimentin and S100. Staining for smooth muscle markers was negative. Two months after surgery, the patient received 5,400 cGy of adjuvant radiotherapy over a 2-month time course.

One year after surgery, she was found to have a right posterior chest wall mass on routine CT surveillance. A CT-guided chest wall biopsy of the soft tissue mass confirmed metastatic malignant schwannoma (Figure 2). A PET-CT demonstrated the chest wall mass with an SUV of 7.9, but no other evidence of distant metastatic disease (Figure 2). She then underwent right thoracotomy and chest wall resection with reconstruction using Goretex mesh. Final pathology, including immunohistochemistry, confirmed that the 3.5 cm soft tissue mass was consistent with metastatic schwannoma.

Figure 2 Right posterior chest wall soft tissue mass suspicious for distant recurrence.

Her immediate post-operative course was unremarkable and she was discharged on post-operative day 4. Her subsequent follow-up CT scans were negative for recurrence or metastatic disease, and she did not require further adjuvant therapy. Figure 3A shows the timeline of the patient’s hospital course and associated clinical and surgical pathology (Figure 3B).

Figure 3 Timeline of (A) symptoms, disease progression and treatment administration. (B) CT images and gross pathology during disease and treatment course. Arrows showing esophageal tumor and (C) chest wall metastasis.

Of note, written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study and any accompanying images. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013).


Discussion

We presented a case in which a patient presented with dysphagia/weight loss secondary to a large esophageal lesion that was undetermined prior to surgery, and she was later diagnosed with malignant esophageal schwannoma following a MIE. Esophageal schwannomas have most commonly been identified in middle-aged women and tend to arise from the proximal esophagus (3). Dysphagia is the most common presenting symptom, but there have been reports of secondary tracheal compression resulting in respiratory distress (4,5). Symptomology (hemoptysis, dysphagia, dyspnea) commonly correlates with tumor size. Most of these lesions are benign, with only 9 reported cases of malignant esophageal schwannomas (3,6-8). Of these, only one case report of lymph node metastasis has been published (6).

Pathologic diagnosis of an esophageal schwannoma can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy with routine histologic evaluation can yield false negative results. In reviewing the literature, we identified only one reported case in which the tissue diagnosis was obtained prior to definitive resection (9). Imaging studies such as CT scan and barium esophagram are unable to differentiate schwannomas from other submucosal lesions of the esophagus. These studies may demonstrate a large homogenous mass causing esophageal compression and obstructive symptoms. Schwannomas are commonly hypermetabolic thus displaying increased FDG uptake on positron emission tomography (PET), but given the Schwann cells inherent ability to transport glucose for axonal repolarization, PET imaging does not aid in differentiating benign, malignant (esophageal) schwannomas, from other esophageal lesions (3,9).

Schwannomas typically show a pattern of positive immunoreactivity to S-100 protein, while being negative for smooth muscle markers: actin, desmin, CD117 and CD34. This AIDS in differentiating these lesions from other gastrointestinal submucosal tumors, such as the more common leiomyoma. Negative staining for neurofilament contributes to differentiating schwannomas from neurofibromas, another variant of peripheral nerve sheath tumor. The histologic criteria for the diagnosis of malignant schwannoma are based on a combination of factors, including the presence of mitotic figures, cellularity, nuclear atypia and tumor necrosis (10). In reports by Iwata et al. (11) and Morita et al. (12), the malignant potential of esophageal schwannoma as manifest by invasion of surrounding tissues correlated with a high mitotic rate and nuclear atypia on histology.

Esophageal schwannomas can be managed with enucleation (3,6), esophagectomy (7,8), or in very select cases with an endoscopic per-oral approach (13). Several studies, although retrospective, have proven safety and feasibility of the per-oral approach (13). Per-oral endoscopic approach is done in selected patients, particularly for lesions less than 2 cm (14). Larger lesions (2–8 cm) should be surgically enucleated and this can be achieved through a right VATs/thoracotomy approach for mid to distal esophageal lesions while some distal lesions can be removed laparoscopically. Enucleation of larger tumors (>8 cm) has been described but surgeons must be prepared to perform esophagectomy for larger tumors as the myotomy required for such an enucleation can obliterate the esophageal wall, the closure of which results in a large patulous segment of esophagus that behaves like a giant diverticulum (6). Such anatomy can leave the patient with poor esophageal function and consequently problems with oral intake.

Few case reports have described open esophagectomy for esophageal schwannomas. Of the nine reported malignant esophageal schwannomas, two of them were performed with an open esophagectomy. Indications for esophagectomy may include size over 8 cm, 3–8 cm with a wide broad base or extensive mucosal defect (15).

Wang et al. (3) reported a case of 6-year disease free survival following enucleation with primary repair of the esophageal mucosal for treatment of a 5.5 cm malignant schwannoma. In patients that were not candidates for enucleation, open esophagectomy resulted 4-year recurrence free survival (7,8).

In conclusion, esophageal schwannomas are uncommon tumors. Malignant transformation is exceedingly rare. Diagnosis prior to resection can be difficult and is aided by recent advances in immunohistochemical staining. PET CT and EUS can be helpful tests for determining whether the tumor is behaving in a benign or malignant fashion. Patients with larger tumors should undergo pre-operative assessment for surgical enucleation and possible need for esophagectomy. In the present case described herein, the esophagus was partially replaced by tumor. Enucleation would not have been feasible in the present case, given the tumor’s size, risk for positive margins and leaving limited functional esophageal wall.

This is a retrospective study (n=1) and is the tenth case report of malignant schwannoma of the esophagus, but the first reported case in which minimally invasive esophagectomy was performed for resection. Given the rare occurrence of this case, it is difficult to generalize the management. A prospective, randomized clinical trial would be warranted to assess outcomes related to diagnostic work up and the role of surgery in this cancer subset. The data pertaining to this patient’s clinical history is limited to computer records, and may be susceptible to recall and reporting bias.


Conclusions

Surgical esophageal expertise with multiple treatment modalities (per oral endoscopic approach, VATS or laparoscopic enucleation, or minimally invasive esophagectomy) is needed to determine the optimal surgical approach for the patient. Surgeons must factor in the false negative rate regarding diagnostic work up for esophageal schwannoma. Malignant transformation is rarely diagnosed in the pre-operative setting, thus there should be a low threshold to proceed with surgical resection of esophageal schwannomas, in the setting of symptomology and lesion size.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This report was supported by the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh and the NCI T32CA113263-11 (Ekeke).


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-14

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-14). JL reports grants from University of Texas SWMC, grants from Anpac Tech of USA, non-financial support from Covidien, other from Intuitive Surgical Inc., Proctor and Gamble, and Cigna Corp., outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study and any accompanying images.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Seremetis MG, Lyons WS, deGuzman VC, et al. Leiomyomata of the esophagus. An analysis of 838 cases. Cancer 1976;38:2166-77. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Mizuguchi S, Inoue K, Imagawa A, et al. Benign esophageal schwannoma compressing the trachea in pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:660-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Wang S, Zheng J, Ruan Z, et al. Long-term survival in a rare case of malignant esophageal schwannoma cured by surgical excision. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:357-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Chen HC, Huang HJ, Wu CY, et al. Esophageal schwannoma with tracheal compression. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;54:555-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Mizuguchi S, Inoue K, Imagawa A, et al. Benign esophageal schwannoma compressing the trachea in pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:660-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Murase K, Hino A, Ozeki Y, et al. Malignant schwannoma of the esophagus with lymph node metastasis: literature review of schwannoma of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol 2001;36:772-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Manger T, Pross M, Haeckel C, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the esophagus. Dig Surg 2000;17:627-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Basoglu A, Celik B, Sengul TA, et al. Esophageal schwannoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:492-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Matsuki A, Kosugi S, Kanda T, et al. Schwannoma of the esophagus: a case exhibiting high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography imaging. Dis Esophagus 2009;22:E6-E10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Ueyama T, Guo KJ, Hashimoto H, et al. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 1992;69:947-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Iwata H, Kataoka M, Yamakawa Y, et al. Esophageal schwannoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:376-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Morita I, Mushiaki H, Shinozaki Y, et al. A case of esophageal submucosal schwannoma with pathological malignant findings. Geka 1996;58:506-10. (in Japanese).
  13. Zhai YQ, Chai NL, Li HK, et al. Endoscopic submucosal excavation and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric schwannoma: five-year experience from a large tertiary center in China. Surg Endosc 2020;34:4943-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Naus PJ, Tio FO, Gross GW. Esophageal schwannoma: first report of successful management by endoscopic removal. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:520-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Souza LCA, Pinto TDA, Cavalcanti HOF, et al. Esophageal schwannoma: Case report and epidemiological, clinical, surgical and immunopathological analysis. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019;55:69-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Dutta R, Kumar A, Jindal T, et al. Concurrent benign schwannoma of oesophagus and posterior mediastinum. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:1032-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Mishra B, Madhusudhan KS, Kilambi R, et al. Malignant Schwannoma of the Esophagus: A Rare Case Report. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:63-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Kitada M, Matsuda Y, Hayashi S, et al. Esophageal schwannoma: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:253. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/aoe-20-14
Cite this article as: Ekeke CN, Baker N, Luketich J, Levy RM. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for a large malignant schwannoma of the esophagus: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Esophagus 2020;3:39.