Treatment and prevention of esophagogastrostomy leaks using anchoring silicone stent
Short Communication

Treatment and prevention of esophagogastrostomy leaks using anchoring silicone stent

Ming-Ho Wu, Han-Yun Wu

Department of Surgery, Tainan Municipal Hospital, Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation, Tainan 701

Correspondence to: Dr. Ming-Ho Wu, MD. 670 Chung-Te Rd., Tainan 701. Email:

Abstract: Esophagogastrostomy leakage is a severe complication after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Cervical anastomosis usually has a higher leak rate than intrathoracic anastomosis. Esophageal stents will be considered in the management or prevention of esophagogastrostomy leaks. Previously we have used an externally fixed silicone tube in the treatment of cervical esophagogastrostomy leaks. Recently, we started to use anchoring silicone stent for managing or preventing esophagogastrostomy leaks. In the management of one patient with anastomotic leakage, the stent was kept in place for 27 days. In three patients who had a high risk of esophagogastrostomy leaks, the anchoring silicone stents were kept in place for 1 week to protect the anastomosis.

Keywords: Esophagogastrostomy leaks; esophageal cancer; anchoring silicone stent

Received: 04 December 2019; Accepted: 19 December 2019; Published: 25 March 2020.

doi: 10.21037/aoe.2019.12.05


Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality (1). The cervical anastomosis was associated with a higher leak rate than intrathoracic anastomosis (2). Prevention of esophagogastrostomy leaks has been emphasized using many strategies, including embedded three-layer esophagogastric anastomosis (3), omentoplasty (4), and mechanical suture. However, the anastomotic leakage still presented in all major series after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (1,2). The mortality rate of cervical anastomotic leakages was still high (1). Almost one-third of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks resulted in an anastomotic stricture (5). Esophageal stents will be considered in the technical success, the clinical success of complete healing of leakage, stent migration, and stent removable. Previously we have used a silicone stent in the treatment of cervical esophagogastrostomy leaks using two fixation stitches at the proximal end of a silicone tube to tie over outside the neck skin (6). Recently, we anchored a silicone stent on a nasogastric tube for managing or preventing esophagogastrostomy leaks.

Patients and methods

Patient selection for placement of anchoring silicone stent

The patient presented with manifestations of esophagogastrostomy leaks and patients had high risk of anastomotic leakage are eligible for placement of the stent.

Application of anchoring silicone stent

This method has been used in the treatment of one patient with cervical esophagogastrostomy leaks and in the prevention of three patients with a high risk of esophagogastrostomy leaks. In the leakage patient who had proximal thoracic esophageal cancer was initially treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and complication of anastomotic leaks occurred on the postoperative day 6. Anchoring silicone stent was placed on the postoperative day 25 and the stent was kept in place for 27 days. The anastomotic leakage was completely sealed (Figure 1). In prevention patients, the first one had proximal esophageal cancer associated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension, the second one had synchronous esophageal cancer and rectal cancer associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and the third one had esophageal cancer associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gall stones. Their stents all were kept in place for 1 week.

Figure 1 A contaminated wound was induced by cervical esophagogastrostomy leaks (left), that was healed after placement of anchoring silicone stent (right).

Placement and removal of anchoring silicone stent

A silicone stent is prepared, which is 5 cm in length, 1.8 cm of out diameter, and 0.1 cm of wall thickness. At surgery, both ends of the silicone stent are anchored on a 16 French nasogastric tube using 2-O Prolene (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA) trans-fixation following posterior sutures of esophagogastrostomy. The stent is adjusted inner the anastomosis (Figure 2). The timing of stent removal depends on different situations. In prevention patients, the stent usually kept in place for 1 week and in treating patients, the stent will be kept more than 3 weeks until the ceasing of leakage was confirmed by clinical observation and Methyl blue test. The stent is removed via the oral cavity using Magill forceps at the bedside.

Figure 2 The illustration indicates the center of anchoring silicone stent inner the anastomosis (arrow).


Leakage of the cervical anastomosis usually occurred at a median time of 7 days after esophagectomy (1) or on the 6th to 8th postoperative day 9 (7). Cervical anastomotic leakage near two-third presented with intrathoracic spread (1). Gooszen pointed out that anastomotic leakage predictors are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) fitness grade III or higher, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus and proximal esophageal tumors (2). Xu et al. pointed out that anastomotic leakage predictors are blood supply of the tissue around the suture line, tension along the suture line, the effectiveness of gastrointestinal decompression, prominent aortic knob, and emphysematous lung (7). Superior thoracic aperture size is also significantly associated with cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (8,9). In the management of anastomotic leaks include stent (10), endovacuum therapy (11), and T-tube (12). Two types of the stent are commonly used including covered self-expanding stent and plastic stent. In a total of 66 studies, patients with anastomotic leaks, plastic stents were associated with higher stent migration, perforation, repositioning, and lower technical success (13). In the present report, we used anchoring silicone stents that avoided stent migration, perforation, or repositioning. The anchoring silicone stent is an alternative tool to manage or prevent esophagogastrostomy leaks.


Funding: None.


Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at MHW serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Esophagus from Oct. 2019 to Sep. 2021. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of accompanying images.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See:


  1. Verstegen MHP, Bouwense SAW, van Workum F, et al. Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. World J Emerg Surg 2019;14:17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, et al. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2018;105:552-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1131-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou D, Liu QX, Deng XF, et al. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:257-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Chang AC, Orringer MB. Management of the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic stricture. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;19:66-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Wu MH, Wu HY. External Fixation of Silicone Stent in Treatment of Cervical Esophagogastrostomy Leaks. Show Chwan Med J 2012;11:29-32.
  7. Xu LT, Sun ZF, Li ZJ, et al. Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardiac portion of the stomach in 850 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1983;35:542-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Mine S, Watanabe M, Okamura A, et al. Superior Thoracic Aperture Size is Significantly Associated with Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy. World J Surg 2017;41:2598-604. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Migita K, et al. Anastomotic leakage following retrosternal pull-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019;404:335-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Hoeppner J, Kulemann B, Seifert G, et al. Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses. Surg Endosc 2014;28:1703-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Jeon JH, Jang HJ, Han JE, et al. Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Postoperative Leakage After Esophagectomy. World J Surg 2020;44:179-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Ichikura T, Kawarabayashi N, Ishikawa K, et al. T-tube management of a major leakage of the cervical esophagogastrostomy after subtotal esophagectomy: report of three cases. Surg Today 2003;33:928-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Spence G, et al. Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020;44:1173-89. [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/aoe.2019.12.05
Cite this article as: Wu MH, Wu HY. Treatment and prevention of esophagogastrostomy leaks using anchoring silicone stent. Ann Esophagus 2020;3:4.

Download Citation