Tracheal and left bronchial-oesophageal fistula repair and salvage 3-phase oesophagectomy supported by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report
Case Report

Tracheal and left bronchial-oesophageal fistula repair and salvage 3-phase oesophagectomy supported by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report

Ben E. Byrne1,2^, Karen Harrison-Phipps3, Cheng Ong4, George Hallward4, Rajiv Shah5, Guy Glover5, Victoria Rizzo3, James Gossage1

1Department of Upper GI Surgery, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 2Department of Upper GI Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK; 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 4Department of Anaesthesia, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 5Department of Critical Care, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

^ORCID: 0000-0002-2183-8166.

Correspondence to: James Gossage. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. Email: james.gossage@gstt.nhs.uk.

Abstract: We present the first report of salvage oesophagectomy for complicated airway-oesophageal fistula disease supported by perioperative veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A 47-year-old female underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced T4N0M0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. During treatment, worsening dysphagia was treated with an oesophageal stent. She then presented with dysphagia and pneumonia, and was referred to our unit with two airway-oesophageal fistulae secondary to oesophageal stent insertion. After ruling out local or systemic recurrence, the patient underwent salvage 3-phase oesophagectomy. Treatment was planned and performed by a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) of anaesthetists, intensivists, thoracic and oesophago-gastric surgeons. Total gas exchange was maintained using ECMO, allowing discontinuation of mechanical ventilation for right thoracotomy and repair of the trachea and left main bronchus with intercostal muscle flaps. Intestinal continuity was restored with a retrosternal gastric conduit. The patient was extubated on the day of surgery and was weaned off ECMO by postoperative day 6. Slow postoperative recovery was complicated by re-intubation for 4 days for respiratory failure. Oral intake improved after pyloric dilation and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 40. Histological examination confirmed no residual malignancy. At 20 weeks post discharge, the patient is eating a normal diet, her weight is stable, and she has returned to full-time work. Elective ECMO support may facilitate safe oesophagectomy in the presence of airway-oesophageal fistula in carefully selected patients.

Keywords: Airway-oesophageal fistula; oesophagectomy; extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation; chemoradiotherapy; case report


Received: 06 May 2020; Accepted: 18 September 2020; Published: 25 December 2020.

doi: 10.21037/aoe-20-43


Introduction

Definitive chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for potentially curable squamous cell carcinoma of the proximal oesophagus (1). Strictures after chemoradiotherapy are common (2), often requiring endoscopic dilation, or a self-expanding stent if refractory to repeated dilations. Stent complications are well recognised, including bleeding, migration, fistula formation and aspiration (3). Subsequent management of airway-oesophageal fistula can be challenging as the underlying tissue is scarred by prior disease and radiation exposure. Treatments include stent removal, further stent placement, within the oesophagus or trachea, or surgical correction. Salvage oesophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy, with airway-oesophageal fistulae, supported by perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has not before been described. We present the following case in which two stent-associated fistulae were managed surgically while the patient was supported by ECMO. We present the following article in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-43) (4).


Case presentation

A 47-year-old female was diagnosed with a locally advanced T4N0M0 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, considered to be invading the left main bronchus on cross-sectional imaging. She had a history of Hodgkin’s lymphoma, polycystic kidney disease and insulin-dependent diabetes. The patient underwent definitive chemo-radiotherapy. This involved 3 cycles of cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil, followed by 50 Gy radiotherapy in 25 fractions (Fr) over 5 weeks with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil. Before starting radiotherapy, she developed worsening dysphagia requiring insertion of an oesophageal stent, allowing treatment completion. She was referred to our unit 6 months later with dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia secondary to erosion of the proximal stent into her trachea. Local gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation demonstrated the fistula, but it was not possible to remove the stent. Biopsies were taken and a second stent placed to seal the fistula. Subsequent imaging (Figure 1) and bronchoscopy showed tracheal and left main bronchus fistulation into the oesophagus. Her case was discussed at the specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting, the biopsies were benign, and PET-CT showed no evidence of metastatic disease. The timeline is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1 Preoperative CT imaging. (A) Upper fistula between oesophageal stent and trachea; (B) lower fistula between oesophageal stent and left main bronchus.
Figure 2 Timeline of diagnoses and treatments.

After further review, it was agreed to perform a salvage 3-phase oesophagectomy with retrosternal gastric pull-up and repair of both fistulas. Optimal access to the oesophagus, trachea and proximal bronchi required right thoracotomy in the left lateral position. Difficulty separating the oesophagus from the trachea and bronchi was anticipated, with risk of further undiagnosed fistulae or airway damage during dissection. An important anaesthetic priority was to avoid airway leak and soiling the lungs by excluding the left main bronchus fistula from ventilation. Another consideration was minimising airway instrumentation to reduce the risk of disrupting any repair. Several oxygenation strategies were considered (Table 1). Balancing the risks of each, the team decided the optimal strategy was to electively perform the procedure on ECMO. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Table 1
Table 1 Oxygenation strategies considered
Full table

In the anaesthetic room, the patient was preoxygenated with high flow nasal oxygenation (Optiflow™, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, New Zealand) in the head up position, avoiding bag mask ventilation, and general anaesthesia was induced. The patient’s trachea was intubated with a Vivasight-SL (Ambu, Denmark) size 7.0, a tracheal tube with integrated high-resolution camera. This enabled placement of a 9 Fr bronchial blocker in the left main bronchus under direct vision. The tracheal tube tip was placed 2 cm above the carina, between the two fistulae. Invasive monitoring was established with right-sided central venous access and a peripheral arterial line. In the operating room, femoro-femoral 25/23 Fr access and return cannulae were inserted via a percutaneous approach. Total intra-venous anaesthesia was maintained. The patient was placed in the left lateral position (Figure 3). A paravertebral catheter was placed under ultrasound guidance for analgesia. ECMO was initiated without systemic heparinisation, allowing mechanical ventilation to be discontinued.

Figure 3 Patient in left lateral position with ECMO catheters in situ. ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Surgery was performed by a combined oesophago-gastric and thoracic surgical team. A right-sided thoracotomy was performed in the 5th intercostal space with excision of the 6th rib and raising of intercostal flaps above and below (Figure 4). The oesophagus was significantly thickened and inflamed with local adhesions to the lung, secondary to the in-situ stents. The oesophagus was mobilised distally and a sling placed. The azygos vein was divided with a vascular linear stapler. Careful dissection was continued proximally with resection of the oesophagus proximally and retrieval of both stents. Two airway defects were identified. The defect in the posterior trachea was closed primarily, but the left main bronchial defect could not be apposed. The intercostal muscle flap was split. The lower portion was used to patch the bronchial defect, and the upper flap reinforced the tracheal repair. Temporary ventilation of the lungs demonstrated no leak from the airways.

Figure 4 Intra-operative images. (A) Intercostal muscle flap from two rib spaces; (B) oesophagus and in situ stents being dissected from distal to proximal; (C) residual proximal oesophagus and airway defects after resection of oesophagus; (D) completed airway repair using intercostal muscle flaps.

After closing the thoracotomy, the patient was placed supine. Open gastric mobilisation, oesophago-gastric resection and conduit formation was performed using a laparoscopic linear stapler. There were significant adhesions at the hiatus and in the distal mediastinum, requiring careful dissection. Left neck dissection was also performed to deliver the cervical oesophagus. A retro-sternal tunnel was created with blunt dissection, and the gastric conduit was delivered. A hand-sewn end-to-side anastomosis was performed. The tip of the conduit was excised with a linear stapler. Two chest drains were placed in the right pleural space, one drain was placed in the mediastinum, and a corrugated drain was inserted in the neck wound.

Postoperatively, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was started electively. ECMO was continued with cautious heparinisation, facilitating early extubation to high flow nasal oxygen and initial pulmonary rehabilitation. Following ECMO decannulation, routine screening identified bilateral femoral vein thromboses associated with the ECMO catheters. Pain management was challenging, requiring a combination of opiates, ketamine and local anaesthetic patches. Water soluble swallow (WSS) on postoperative day 8 showed no evidence of anastomotic leak. On postoperative day 15 the patient was discharged to the ward. The patient made slow progress mobilising, and struggled to establish oral intake, requiring continued TPN support. Nasojejunal tube feeding was commenced on postoperative day 23. Two days later, the patient developed type 2 respiratory failure requiring re-intubation and admission to the intensive care unit where she was treated for hospital acquired pneumonia. The patient was extubated after 4 days. A further WSS demonstrated poor gastric conduit emptying, successfully treated with endoscopic dilation to 20 mm under general anaesthesia on postoperative day 36. The patient subsequently made good progress with oral intake and was discharged without supplemental tube feeding on postoperative day 40. She continued on daily low-molecular weight heparin anticoagulation for her venous thromboses.

Histopathological analysis of the resected specimen showed no evidence of residual malignancy. At her most recent follow-up, 20 weeks post discharge, the patient is eating a full normal diet and her weight is stable. She has problematic nocturnal reflux despite acid suppression medication. There is no clinical evidence of disease recurrence. The patient has returned to work full-time and is able to exercise.


Discussion

ECMO is a form of extracorporeal life support, initially developed in the 1970s, that can provide total body gas exchange with no reliance on the lungs (5). Whilst early use in adult patients was associated with very high mortality rates, the technique subsequently became established in neonatal and paediatric patients, with increasingly successful use in adults occurring more recently. In adults, ECMO is indicated in the management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when other ventilatory strategies have failed or caused lung injury, to allow parenchymal recovery. Six commissioned centres provide adult respiratory ECMO support through regionalised networks in the UK (6).

This report presents an important and useful strategy to safely facilitate oesophagectomy in the presence of complex airway-oesophageal fistula. The authors are only aware of three previous case reports describing the use of ECMO to maintain oxygenation for elective oesophagectomy (7-9). In two, ECMO was required due to previous left pneumonectomy (7,8). The third report from Pinelli and colleagues described oesophagectomy for multi-level oesophageal stenoses, subsequent to childhood oesophageal atresia, reconstructive surgery and iatrogenic tracheo-oesophageal fistula (9). Previous surgical alteration of the tracheo-bronchial tree precluded left-sided one-lung ventilation. In our case, ECMO was selected from a range of options. Preoperative planning anticipated a risk of additional unidentified fistulae, or major airway disruption during oesophageal dissection. As these eventualities did not transpire in our case, the alternative oxygenation strategies could have been successfully adopted. However, if these had occurred, the alternative strategies could have failed, requiring ventilation of the lung distal to the airway disruption by tracheal tube through the surgical wound, or high-pressure source ventilation through a jet ventilation catheter. Emergency ECMO mid-surgery would be near impossible due to the time taken for patient repositioning and ECMO cannulation. Elective institution of ECMO eliminated concerns about undetected fistulae or airway trauma, allowed complete discontinuation of ventilation, and facilitated a seamless transition back to a lung-protective ventilation strategy using low airway pressure (10), minimising risk of disruption to the airway repair. Continuing ECMO post-operatively facilitated early extubation.

ECMO is an invasive procedure and is associated with complications, of a primarily mechanical or haematological nature (11). Mechanical complications mirror those associated with any central vascular cannulation and include arterial or venous vascular injury, cardiac perforation or pneumothorax (when using a jugular approach). In the haematological system, ECMO may cause haemolysis but also leads to a complex and challenging balance of thrombosis and bleeding (12). The large area of contact with a non-endothelial surface is a strong activator of both inflammation and systemic coagulation. Therefore, thrombosis may occur, leading to membrane failure and/or venous thrombosis in the patient. Clotting activation may lead to a picture of disseminated intravascular coagulation which compounds the coagulopathy directly attributable to the extra-corporeal circuit (due to an acquired von Willebrand Factor deficiency and platelet dysfunction). Therefore, in the context of critical illness and/or invasive procedures, minor or major bleeding complications may occur from cannulation sites, wounds, mucosal surfaces (for example, gastro-intestinal or pulmonary bleeding) including the feared complication of spontaneous intra-cranial haemorrhage. It is routine to use systemic anticoagulation, typically with unfractionated heparin, to reduce thrombosis but this must always be balanced against the risk of bleeding. Modern, biocompatible surface coatings (Bioline, Maquet Hirrlingen, Germany) in the circuit do permit short periods of time without systemic heparinisation, where the risk of bleeding is very high, as in this case in the peri-operative period. However, limited heparinisation may in itself be an additional risk factor for post-ECMO deep vein thrombosis, which occurred in this case (13).

Salvage oesophagectomy for airway-oesophageal fistula after definitive chemoradiotherapy is a major undertaking, with significant risk of mortality and morbidity. The addition of ECMO further increases the complexity and risk of this procedure. It should only be undertaken in the setting of multidisciplinary care, after every effort has been made to ensure there is no residual malignant disease, and in patients who are physiologically fit enough to survive both the primary insult and the complications that may be expected in such cases. However, in selected patients, use of ECMO facilitates safe surgery and good results may be achieved for an otherwise intractable problem.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-43

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aoe-20-43). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, et al. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 2011;60:1449-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Hamer PW, Hight SC, Ward IG, et al. Stricture rate after chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a 20-year experience. ANZ J Surg 2019;89:367-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Doosti-Irani A, Mansournia MA, Rahimi-Foroushani A, et al. Complications of stent placement in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0184784. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:223. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Mosier JM, Kelsey M, Raz Y, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for critically ill adults in the emergency department: history, current applications, and future directions. Crit Care 2015;19:431. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Respiratory Care. ECMO Physio Network. [cited 2020 Apr 21]. Available online: https://www.acprc.org.uk/resources/critical-care/ecmo-physiotherapy-network/
  7. Schiff JH, Köninger J, Teschner J, et al. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support during anaesthesia for oesophagectomy. Anaesthesia 2013;68:527-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Xu HC, Ye P, Bao FC, et al. ECMO-assisted esophagectomy after left pneumonectomy. Int J Artif Organs 2013;36:259-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Pinelli F, Romagnoli S, Bevilacqua S, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted esophagectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015;29:436-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. O'Gara B, Talmor D. Perioperative lung protective ventilation. BMJ 2018;362:k3030. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Vaquer S, de Haro C, Peruga P, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and mortality of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 2017;7:51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Doyle AJ, Hunt BJ. Current understanding of how extracorporeal membrane oxygenators activate haemostasis and other blood components. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:352. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Cooper E, Burns J, Retter A, et al. Prevalence of venous thrombosis following venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2015;43:e581-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/aoe-20-43
Cite this article as: Byrne BE, Harrison-Phipps K, Ong C, Hallward G, Shah R, Glover G, Rizzo V, Gossage J. Tracheal and left bronchial-oesophageal fistula repair and salvage 3-phase oesophagectomy supported by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report. Ann Esophagus 2020;3:40.